Following an investigation into funds stolen from a victim in Venezuela, CRIXTO worked closely with investigators and industry partners to help trace the movement of the stolen assets. AQ Forensics supported the investigation with external on-chain analysis, reconstructing transaction paths across multiple services. Information shared during the investigation helped identify wallets connected to the incident and supported efforts to recover a substantial portion of the funds.
After a tip from a trusted source, ChangeNOW blocklisted the compromised wallets and stopped five exchange attempts initiated from them. Once Venezuela's Scientific, Penal, and Criminal Investigations Corps (CICPC) formally requested the seizure of the frozen assets, we verified the request and returned 772,440.7575 USDT (TRC20) and 182.3057699 SOL, worth approximately $791,252, to wallets identified as belonging to the victim.
What happened
The case involved funds stolen from a victim in Venezuela and subsequently moved across the blockchain.
CRIXTO played an active role in responding to the incident, providing information that helped investigators and industry participants follow the movement of the stolen assets and identify relevant transactions and addresses. This kind of rapid cooperation is particularly important in crypto investigations, where funds can move between wallets, networks, and services within minutes.
AQ Forensics also supported the investigation with external on-chain analysis, reconstructing transaction paths across multiple services and identifying a previously unattributed wallet that appeared to have a connection to ChangeNOW. The team shared the relevant transaction data and technical findings with ChangeNOW for review.
The wallet itself initially appeared to offer no obvious next step. However, AQ Forensics continued examining activity around it, including services used by the same actors shortly before. As the team explained, an inactive wallet does not necessarily mean that an investigative trail has ended: access may have been lost, assets may already have been intercepted, or those controlling the wallet may simply be waiting before moving them again.
“When the obvious tracing path ends, we do not automatically assume the trail is over. In this case, we looked at services the same actors had used shortly before and asked whether the wallet could be linked to activity on their side. Sometimes the decisive lead comes from activity around the wallet rather than from the wallet itself.”
Based on the information available, ChangeNOW added the addresses to its blocklist as a precaution.
Once the addresses had been flagged, our monitoring system detected five exchange attempts initiated from them and stopped the transactions before the funds could move further.



